Noble v. Landry

143 So. 329, 175 La. 367, 1929 La. LEXIS 2047
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 22, 1929·No. No. 29534.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Plaintiff sued for separation from bed and board; defendant joined issue and reconvened for the same relief. The trial judge rejected both demands, and both parties have appealed.

Plaintiff has filed a motion in this court to "discontinue this suit."

The motion, as a motion to discontinue, comes too late. A plaintiff may indeed discontinue his suit if so minded (though not to the prejudice of a reconventional demand), but he must do so before judgment is rendered in the court below. Code Prac. arts. 491, 532; Trenchard v. N.O. Ry. Lt. Co., 123 La. 36, 40, 48 So. 575.

On the other hand, if considered as a motion to dismiss plaintiff's own appeal, it is not consented to by defendant and therefore cannot be allowed. Where an appeal has been perfected and the jurisdiction of the appellate court has attached, the appeal cannot be withdrawn without the consent of all the appellees and of the court. Code Prac. arts. 594, 595, 901; Succession of Trouilly, 52 La. Ann. 276, 26 So. 851.

The motion is therefore denied. *Page 369

On Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Appeal of Defendant in Reconvention.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noble v. Landry, 143 So. 329, 175 La. 367, 1929 La. LEXIS 2047 (La. 1929).

143 So. 329 (Noble v. Landry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Womack v. Varnado
16 So. 2d 825 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1943)
Birdow v. Midyett
9 So. 2d 414 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1942)
Diamond T. Motor Trucks, Inc. v. Bilich.
167 So. 832 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)