Noble v. Harnick

278 A.D. 581, 102 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4021

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of plaintiffs’ intestate, judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appellants’ evidence adduced upon the trial of this action, based upon an unwitnessed fatal accident, is at best as consistent with the absence of any wrongful act upon the part of respondents contributing thereto as with its presence. (Wieland v. Third Ave. Tr. Corp., 270 App. Div. 885, affd. 296 N. Y. 1047; Lamb v. Union My. Co., 195 N. Y. 260, 266; Digelormo v. Weil, 260 N. Y. 192, 200.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noble v. Harnick, 278 A.D. 581, 102 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

278 A.D. 581 (Noble v. Harnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lamb v. Union Railway Co.
88 N.E. 871 (New York Court of Appeals, 1909)
Digelormo v. Weil
183 N.E. 360 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)
Wieland v. Third Avenue Transit Corporation
73 N.E.2d 914 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)
Wieland v. Third Avenue Transit Corp.
270 A.D. 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)