Noble v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Noble v. Commonwealth

746 N.E.2d 488, 434 Mass. 1001, 2001 Mass. LEXIS 197

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedApril 24, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 746 N.E.2d 488 (Noble v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Noble v. Commonwealth, 746 N.E.2d 488, 434 Mass. 1001, 2001 Mass. LEXIS 197 (Mass. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Kevin V. Noble (petitioner) appeals under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from the denial of relief by a single justice of this court. The petitioner had brought, pro se, a petition for a review of a bail determination, or for relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. Two Superior Court judges had ordered that the petitioner be held without bail.

Rule 2:21 (1) requires that the notice of appeal be filed within seven days of the entry of the judgment, unless the court otherwise orders. The petitioner states in his memorandum filed pursuant to rule 2:21 that the single justice denied the petition on July 28, 2000, and that he “timely appealed.” The judgment at issue was entered on July 28, 2000, and the petitioner’s notice of appeal (dated August 15¹) was received and docketed on August 25, well beyond the time allowed under the rule. The docket does not indicate that the court adjusted the time for the filing of the notice of appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kevin V. Noble (petitioner) appeals under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from the denial of relief by a single justice of this court. The petitioner had brought, pro se, a petition for a review of a bail determination, or for relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. Two Superior Court judges had ordered that the petitioner be held without bail.

Rule 2:21 (1) requires that the notice of appeal be filed within seven days of the entry of the judgment, unless the court otherwise orders. The petitioner states in his memorandum filed pursuant to rule 2:21 that the single justice denied the petition on July 28, 2000, and that he “timely appealed.” The judgment at issue was entered on July 28, 2000, and the petitioner’s notice of appeal (dated August 15¹) was received and docketed on August 25, well beyond the time allowed under the rule. The docket does not indicate that the court adjusted the time for the filing of the notice of appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

746 N.E.2d 488, 434 Mass. 1001, 2001 Mass. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noble-v-commonwealth-mass-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack