Noble v. Cleland

100 P. 254, 7 Cal. Unrep. 362
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 19, 1909
DocketS. F. No. 4899
StatusPublished

This text of 100 P. 254 (Noble v. Cleland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noble v. Cleland, 100 P. 254, 7 Cal. Unrep. 362 (Cal. 1909).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action by a taxpayer to enjoin payment of a city warrant issued in payment of the monthly salary of one B. H. Miller as ‘ ‘ executive officer' ’ of said city of Ukiah. The office in question was created by an ordinance of’the board of trustees of the city. Plaintiff claims that the board had no power to pass the ordinance creating [363]*363the office, and hence that it is void. The court below held the ordinance valid, and gave judgment for the defendant. In the case of De Merritt v. Welden, 154 Cal. 545, 16 Ann. Cas. 955, 98 Pac. 537, 671, this court, in bank, considered this question, and declared the ordinance valid.

Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Merritt v. Weldon
98 P. 537 (California Supreme Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 P. 254, 7 Cal. Unrep. 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noble-v-cleland-cal-1909.