Noble v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

927 P.2d 1120, 145 Or. App. 256, 326 Or. 43, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1853, 1996 WL 718136
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 11, 1996
DocketCA A89837
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 927 P.2d 1120 (Noble v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noble v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 927 P.2d 1120, 145 Or. App. 256, 326 Or. 43, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1853, 1996 WL 718136 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision establishing conditions of parole, including declarations that petitioner is a high risk dangerous offender and a predatory sex offender. ORS 181.585 to ORS 181.589.

Petitioner’s arguments are resolved contrary to his position by our decisions in Schuch v. Board of Parole, 139 Or App 327, 912 P2d 403, rev den 324 Or 78 (1996), Gress v. Board of Parole, 143 Or App 7, 924 P2d 329, on recons 144 Or App 375, 927 P2d 138 (1996), and Coleman v. Board of Parole, 144 Or App 487, 927 P2d 622 (1996).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Henderson-Laird
380 P.3d 1066 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2016)
State v. Hites-Clabaugh
283 P.3d 402 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2012)
State v. Thomas
1 P.3d 1058 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)
Noble v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
964 P.2d 990 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
927 P.2d 1120, 145 Or. App. 256, 326 Or. 43, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1853, 1996 WL 718136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noble-v-board-of-parole-post-prison-supervision-orctapp-1996.