Noble El-Bey v. City of Greensboro

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2030

NOBLE TORNELLO FONTAINE PIERCE EL-BEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF GREENSBORO; CITY OF GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT; DISTRICT 4 POLICE OFFICER BADGE # 110 E; JOHN DOE(4),

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00291-NCT-WWD)

Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Noble Tornello Fontaine Pierce El-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. James Anthony Clark, CITY OF GREENSBORO LEGAL DEPARTMENT, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Noble Tornello Fontaine Pierce El-Bey appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 1

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. 2 El-Bey v. City of Greensboro, No. 1:10-cv-00291-NCT-WWD

(M.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

1 We consider El-Bey’s objections to the report of the magistrate judge sufficiently specific to preserve our appellate jurisdiction. 2 El-Bey has filed a document entitled “Objection to Attorney Testimony,” which we have construed as a motion to strike Appellee’s brief and to sanction Appellee’s counsel. We deny El-Bey’s motion.