Nobiletti v. Zunic Landscape, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nobiletti v. Zunic Landscape, Inc.

140 A.D.2d 779, 527 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4671

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 5, 1988·Published

Opinion

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, appeals from an order which stayed the enforcement of a money judgment he obtained against defendant in the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, and then docketed by transcript in Broome County. We do not reach the merits of plaintiff’s contentions on appeal since the order appealed from, by its own terms, expired 90 days from the date of entry. Because this order is no longer in effect, the appeal must be dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed, as moot, without costs. Casey, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, appeals from an order which stayed the enforcement of a money judgment he obtained against defendant in the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, and then docketed by transcript in Broome County. We do not reach the merits of plaintiff’s contentions on appeal since the order appealed from, by its own terms, expired 90 days from the date of entry. Because this order is no longer in effect, the appeal must be dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed, as moot, without costs. Casey, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Nobiletti v. Zunic Landscape, Inc., 140 A.D.2d 779, 527 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

140 A.D.2d 779 (Nobiletti v. Zunic Landscape, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.