Noah's Ark, Division of Eckmar Corp. v. Geib

31 A.D.2d 886, 298 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4573
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 20, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgments unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The record shows thait respondent re-entered his premises peaceably, but is forcibly excluding appellant tenant from reoeeupying them. Thus, there is no merit to appellant’s claim that it was forcibly evicted. The record also shows that the fire damage to the premises was so extensive (90% of the value thereof) that the landlord was justified in deciding to rebuild and declaring the lease terminated (Corbett V. Spring Garden Ins. Co., 155 N. Y. 389; same case after retrial, opinion 40 App. Div. 628, affd. without opinion, 167 N. Y. 596). (Appeal from judgments of Monroe Trial Term dismissing proceeding to recover real property.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Witmer, Gabrielli and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noah's Ark, Division of Eckmar Corp. v. Geib, 31 A.D.2d 886, 298 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

31 A.D.2d 886 (Noah's Ark, Division of Eckmar Corp. v. Geib) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mawardi v. Purple Potato, Ltd.
187 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)