Noah v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Noah v. State

1913 OK CR 1, 132 P. 829, 8 Okla. Crim. 448, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 465

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided December 14, 1912·No. No. A-1254.·Published

Opinion

FURMAN, P. J.

, This is a companion case to the case of Alex Bates v. State, ante, in which both defendants were jointly prosecuted for the theft of cattle and a severance was granted by the trial court to the state upon the request of the county attorney. This is not an open question in Oklahoma. See Bates v. State, ante, and Dan Anderson v. State, ante.

From the evidence in this case we do not see how any jury could come to any other conclusion than that both of these defendants are guilty of cow-stealing.. We find no material error in the record. The judgment of the lower court is, therefore, in all things affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and DOYEE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FURMAN, P. J.

, This is a companion case to the case of Alex Bates v. State, ante, in which both defendants were jointly prosecuted for the theft of cattle and a severance was granted by the trial court to the state upon the request of the county attorney. This is not an open question in Oklahoma. See Bates v. State, ante, and Dan Anderson v. State, ante.

From the evidence in this case we do not see how any jury could come to any other conclusion than that both of these defendants are guilty of cow-stealing.. We find no material error in the record. The judgment of the lower court is, therefore, in all things affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and DOYEE, JJ., concur.

Noah v. State, 1913 OK CR 1, 132 P. 829, 8 Okla. Crim. 448, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 465 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1913 OK CR 1 (Noah v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.