No.

Colorado Attorney General Reports·Decided February 11, 1982·Published

Opinion

Joseph P. Natale Executive Secretary Public Employees' Retirement Association 1300 Logan Street Denver, CO 80203

Dear Mr. Natale:

This opinion letter is in response to your December 3, 1981 letter in which you inquired about the Public Employees' Retirement Association ("PERA") requirements for general assembly members and certain elected officials.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED AND CONCLUSIONS

Your request for an attorney general's opinion presents four questions:

1. Does a member of the general assembly have an option to elect PERA coverage under C.R.S. 1973, 24-51-128(2), upon each re-election?

My conclusion is "yes." It is my opinion that the option to elect coverage under PERA is available each time a member of the general assembly takes the oath of office.

2. Does PERA rule 10.203 mandate continuous coverage in the following situations:

a. A PERA member is elected to the general assembly and begins legislative service directly from his former PERA-covered job.

b. A member of the general assembly becomes covered by PERA for his legislative service and is re-elected with no break in service?

My conclusion is "no" in both fact situations. Continuous coverage by PERA is not required for members of the general assembly who choose to exempt themselves from coverage.

3. Are there any constitutional provisions, statutes or rules which prohibit or restrict members of the general assembly from receiving both a legislative salary and a PERA annuity?

My conclusion is "no." It is my opinion that a member of the general assembly may receive both his salary and a PERA annuity if he has properly exempted himself from PERA coverage.

4. Would the issues found in question Nos. 1, 2 and 3 above be answered differently for the following occupational groups:

a. elective state officers

b. employees of the general assembly

c. district attorneys

d. elected municipal officials?

My conclusions are as follows:

1. Elected municipal officials have the same option as the members of the general assembly to elect PERA coverage upon each re-election. Elective state officers, employees of the general assembly, and district attorneys have the option to elect coverage only upon their initial employment.

2. Elective state officers, employees of the general assembly, district attorneys, and elected municipal officials are not required to continue PERA coverage if they commence their respective positions from PERA-affiliated employment (fact situation a). However, only the elected municipal officials have the option to exempt themselves from PERA coverage upon re-election with no break in service. Elective state officers, employees of the general assembly and district attorneys are required to continue PERA coverage upon such re-election (fact situation b).

3. If properly exempted from PERA coverage, elective state officers, employees of the general assembly, district attorneys, and elected municipal officials will not violate the Colorado Constitution, state statutes, or PERA rules by receiving both a salary and a PERA annuity from other affiliated employment. Because district attorneys may be paid an additional salary by the city or county, there may be local prohibitions against such remuneration.

ANALYSIS

1. C.R.S. 1973, 24-51-128(2) creates an option for members of the general assembly to elect coverage under PERA. This subsection states in part:

(2) (A)ll persons who become members of the general assembly after June 8, 1967, shall become members of the retirement association, unless within thirty days after taking the oath of office any such member notifies the public employees' retirement association in writing that he desires to exempt himself from the benefits of this section, and the salary deductions and payments provided in this part 1 shall be made on account of such members of the general assembly. Any member who has thus exempted himself from membership in the retirement system may, at his option at a later date, apply for membership therein; except that only the service of such member rendered as such after the date of such membership shall be allowed by the retirement board in computing retirement benefits.

It is a basic rule of statutory construction that when the language of a statute is plain and its meaning clear, it must be applied as written. Myers v. Woodall, 42 Colo. App. 44,592 P.2d 1343 (1978), Franks v. Charnes,43 Colo. App. 217, 600 P.2d 124 (1979).

The statutory language of C.R.S. 1973, 24-51-128(2) is clear and unambiguous. It grants to members of the general assembly an option to participate in PERA. If the member chooses not to participate, he must exercise this option within 30 days after taking the oath of office. There is no language which states that the member only has this option the first time he takes the oath of office; rather, the statute anticipates that a member may change his mind about his PERA participation. See also, C.R.S. 1973, 24-51-102 (Supp. 1981).

2. Employees who terminate PERA-affiliated employment, and then return to PERA-affiliated employment by the end of the next complete calendar month, are required under PERA rule 10.203 to continue PERA membership. That rule states in part:

A member who later returns to affiliated employment by the end of the next complete calendar month following the month in which his membership terminated, pursuant to Rule 10.106, shall be required to continue membership.

8 C.C.R. 1502-1, as amended.

In both fact situations, the general assembly member has not returned to "affiliated employment" because he has chosen to exempt himself from such coverage. The employment cannot be "affiliated" with PERA unless the general assembly member chooses to make it so. Therefore, in fact situation "a," the newly elected general assembly member may, within 30 days of taking the oath of office, elect not to participate in PERA. In fact situation "b," the legislator may, within 30 days of taking the oath of office, upon his re-election, elect no longer to participate in PERA.

3. You have referred in your letter to an opinion letter from former Attorney General John Moore. This January 7, 1974 opinion stated that article V, section 6 of the Colorado Constitution forbids the members of the general assembly from receiving any compensation, perquisite or allowance other than compensation for services and traveling expenses. That opinion suggested that the grant of PERA benefits to otherwise qualified members of the general assembly would fall within this constitutional prohibition.

Article V, section 6 of the Colorado Constitution was repealed and reenacted, with amendments, on November 5, 1974. The amendments deleted the prohibition against receipt of outside compensation. Therefore, the Colorado Constitution does not prohibit members of the general assembly from receiving both legislative salaries and PERA benefits.

C.R.S. 1973, 24-51-134 states:

24-51-134. Retired state members — employment in position covered by association — when. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 24-2-103

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No., (Colo. 1982).

No. (No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Finnigan v. Sandoval
600 P.2d 123 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1979)
Myers v. Woodall
592 P.2d 1343 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1978)
Augustin v. Barnes
626 P.2d 625 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1981)