No. 13116

283 F.2d 950
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedSeptember 22, 1960
Docket950_1
StatusPublished

This text of 283 F.2d 950 (No. 13116) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
No. 13116, 283 F.2d 950 (3d Cir. 1960).

Opinion

283 F.2d 950

Mildred HOHENSEE, Richard Roe No. 1, Richard Roe No. 2,
Mildred Hohensee, Appellant
v.
Albert L. WATSON; American Medical Association, its Officers
and Members; John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2, John Doe No. 3,
John Doe No. 4; J. Julius Levy; George Clark; Stephen
Teller; John Doe No. 1; John Doe No. 2; John Doe No. 3.

No. 13116.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 13, 1960.
Decided Sept. 22, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; Frederick V. Follmer, Judge.

James C. Newton, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Joseph C. Kreder, Scranton, Pa. (Warren, Hill, Henkelman & McMenamin, Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for George Clark, appellee.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint of the appellant. The lack of merit of the plaintiff's complaint was adequately set out by the district judge and no further discussion is necessary. 188 F.Supp. 941.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hohensee v. Watson
283 F.2d 950 (Third Circuit, 1960)
Hohensee v. Watson
188 F. Supp. 941 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 F.2d 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/no-13116-ca3-1960.