Nnonyelu v. Chili's, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nnonyelu v. Chili's, Inc.

632 So. 2d 691, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1807, 1994 WL 57580

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 1994

DocketNo. 91-03974

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 632 So. 2d 691 (Nnonyelu v. Chili's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nnonyelu v. Chili's, Inc., 632 So. 2d 691, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1807, 1994 WL 57580 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on appeal from an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC), applying section 440.02(24), Florida Statutes (Supp.1990), to deny inclusion of concurrent earnings in the calculation of Felicia Nnonyelu’s average weekly wage (AWW). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Nnonyelu’s compensable accident occurred on November 4, 1990, during the “window” period to which the 1990 amendments to chapter 440 apply. See Ballard v. Morning Star Construction, 629 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), citing Garcia v. Carmar Structural, Inc., 629 So.2d 117 (Fla.1993). Thus, the JCC did not err in applying the 1990 amendments to Nnonyelu’s claim. However, considering this court’s opinion in Vegas v. Globe Security, 627 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (en banc), we conclude the JCC .did err in construing the 1990 amendments. Therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings in accordance with Vegas. For foregoing reason, we find it unnecessary to reach the constitutional issues raised by Nnonyelu.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BOOTH, KAHN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on appeal from an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC), applying section 440.02(24), Florida Statutes (Supp.1990), to deny inclusion of concurrent earnings in the calculation of Felicia Nnonyelu’s average weekly wage (AWW). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Nnonyelu’s compensable accident occurred on November 4, 1990, during the “window” period to which the 1990 amendments to chapter 440 apply. See Ballard v. Morning Star Construction, 629 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), citing Garcia v. Carmar Structural, Inc., 629 So.2d 117 (Fla.1993). Thus, the JCC did not err in applying the 1990 amendments to Nnonyelu’s claim. However, considering this court’s opinion in Vegas v. Globe Security, 627 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (en banc), we conclude the JCC .did err in construing the 1990 amendments. Therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings in accordance with Vegas. For foregoing reason, we find it unnecessary to reach the constitutional issues raised by Nnonyelu.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BOOTH, KAHN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

632 So. 2d 691, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1807, 1994 WL 57580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nnonyelu-v-chilis-inc-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack