N.M. v. Department of Children & Families
785 So. 2d 530, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 841, 2001 WL 76656
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 2001·No. No. 3D00-1570·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm the adjudication of dependency. See Herrera v. Dep’t of Health and Rehab. Servs., 631 So.2d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Hardy v. Dep’t of Health and Rehab. Servs., 568 So.2d 1314 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). However, we remand this case with instructions to the trial court to conform the order to the oral pronouncements and findings made at the adjudicatory hearing.
Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
N.M. v. Department of Children & Families, 785 So. 2d 530, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 841, 2001 WL 76656 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
785 So. 2d 530 (N.M. v. Department of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilkinson v. Wilkinson
203 So. 3d 186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)