NLRB v. Intl Brhd

Fifth Circuit

NLRB v. Intl Brhd

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 15, 2007

Docket06-60438

StatusUnpublished

This text of NLRB v. Intl Brhd (NLRB v. Intl Brhd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NLRB v. Intl Brhd, (5th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D August 15, 2007 No. 06-60438 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Petitioner - Cross-Respondent v.

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, Local Union No. 657

Respondent - Cross-Petitioner

Petition for Review & Cross-Petition for Enforcement from an Order of the National Labor Relations Board No. 16-CB-6348

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We review the remedial orders of back pay by the National Labor Relations Board to ensure that the Board was not arbitrary in its selection of a formula used to calculate back pay, NLRB v. Charley Toppino & Sons, Inc., 358 F.2d 94, 97 (5th Cir. 1966), and that the Board’s award of back pay was not punitive, Florida Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 587 F.2d 735, 746 (5th Cir. 1979). In this case, there is no evidence to support a claim that the Board was either arbitrary or punitive. Based on the deferential standard of review we give to the Board’s

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 06-60438

order of back pay, its order shall be ENFORCED. Respondent’s cross-petition for review is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D August 15, 2007 No. 06-60438 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Petitioner - Cross-Respondent v.

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, Local Union No. 657

Respondent - Cross-Petitioner

Petition for Review & Cross-Petition for Enforcement from an Order of the National Labor Relations Board No. 16-CB-6348

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We review the remedial orders of back pay by the National Labor Relations Board to ensure that the Board was not arbitrary in its selection of a formula used to calculate back pay, NLRB v. Charley Toppino & Sons, Inc., 358 F.2d 94, 97 (5th Cir. 1966), and that the Board’s award of back pay was not punitive, Florida Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 587 F.2d 735, 746 (5th Cir. 1979). In this case, there is no evidence to support a claim that the Board was either arbitrary or punitive. Based on the deferential standard of review we give to the Board’s

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 06-60438

order of back pay, its order shall be ENFORCED. Respondent’s cross-petition for review is DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

NLRB v. Intl Brhd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nlrb-v-intl-brhd-ca5-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack