N.L.R.B. v. Canning

570 U.S. 916, 186 L. Ed. 2d 908, 133 S. Ct. 2861, 81 U.S.L.W. 3702, 2013 WL 1771081, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4876
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 24, 2013
DocketNo. 12–1281.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 570 U.S. 916 (N.L.R.B. v. Canning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
N.L.R.B. v. Canning, 570 U.S. 916, 186 L. Ed. 2d 908, 133 S. Ct. 2861, 81 U.S.L.W. 3702, 2013 WL 1771081, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4876 (2013).

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted. In addition to the questions presented by the *2862petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether the President's recess-appointment power may be exercised when the Senate is convening every three days in pro forma sessions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
570 U.S. 916, 186 L. Ed. 2d 908, 133 S. Ct. 2861, 81 U.S.L.W. 3702, 2013 WL 1771081, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nlrb-v-canning-scotus-2013.