N.L.R. v. C.A.D. F.G.

863 So. 2d 1071, 2003 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 304, 2003 WL 2007925
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMay 2, 2003
Docket2001292
StatusPublished

This text of 863 So. 2d 1071 (N.L.R. v. C.A.D. F.G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
N.L.R. v. C.A.D. F.G., 863 So. 2d 1071, 2003 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 304, 2003 WL 2007925 (Ala. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

YATES, Presiding Judge.

This court, on July 12, 2002, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. N.L.R. v. C.A.D., (No. 2001292, July 12, 2002) - So.2d - (Ala.Civ.App.2002) (table). The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed this court’s judgment and has remanded the case to this court. Ex parte N.L.R., 863 So.2d 1066 (Ala.2003). The trial court’s judgment is reversed, in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, and PITTMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

N.L.R. v. C.A.D.
863 So. 2d 1066 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
863 So. 2d 1071, 2003 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 304, 2003 WL 2007925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nlr-v-cad-fg-alacivapp-2003.