N.J.S v. K.S.

Missouri Court of Appeals

N.J.S v. K.S.

572 S.W.3d 160

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 23, 2019

DocketWD 81640; Consolidated with WD 81654

StatusPublished

This text of 572 S.W.3d 160 (N.J.S v. K.S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.J.S v. K.S., 572 S.W.3d 160 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

S.S. (Mother) and K.S. (Father) appeal from the circuit court's judgment assuming jurisdiction over their minor child, N.J.S., concluding that the child was in need of care and treatment under section 211.031.1(1)(a) and (b), RSMo 2016, and placing him in the custody of the Children's Division. Mother asserts six points on appeal, and Father asserts five. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for the decision has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

S.S. (Mother) and K.S. (Father) appeal from the circuit court's judgment assuming jurisdiction over their minor child, N.J.S., concluding that the child was in need of care and treatment under section 211.031.1(1)(a) and (b), RSMo 2016, and placing him in the custody of the Children's Division. Mother asserts six points on appeal, and Father asserts five. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for the decision has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 S.W.3d 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/njs-v-ks-moctapp-2019.