N.J.M. v. State

32 So. 3d 731, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in N.J.M. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 So. 3d 731
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 2010·No. No. 5D09-2249·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

N.J.M. was adjudicated guilty of three counts of sexual battery on a child under twelve years of age by a person under eighteen years of age. He was not committed to a residential program but was, instead, placed on probation until his nineteenth birthday. Over objection, the trial court designated N.J.M. as a “serious or habitual juvenile offender” (SHO). On appeal, N.J.M. argues that section 985.47(1), Florida Statutes (2008), permits a SHO designation only when made in conjunction with a commitment to a residential facility. The State properly concedes error.

(1) CRITERIA — A ‘serious or habitual juvenile offender,’ for purposes of commitment to a residential facility and for purposes of records retention, means a child who has been found to have committed a delinquent act or a violation of law, in the case currently before the court, ...

§ 985.47(1), Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis added).

On remand, the trial court is directed to strike the SHO designation.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

TORPY, EVANDER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

N.J.M. v. State, 32 So. 3d 731, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

32 So. 3d 731 (N.J.M. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.