N.J.G. v. State

264 So. 3d 960
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 6, 2019
DocketNo. 4D18-1665
StatusPublished

This text of 264 So. 3d 960 (N.J.G. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
N.J.G. v. State, 264 So. 3d 960 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this Anders1 appeal we affirm the finding of guilt, the adjudication of delinquency, and the sentencing, but remand for the trial court to correct the delinquency disposition orders to include the maximum penalty defined by statute and to specify the amount of time appellant served in secure detention before disposition. See Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.115(d).

Affirmed and remanded.

May, Levine and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 So. 3d 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/njg-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.