N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. A.S.K. (In re Guardianship N.D.K.)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. A.S.K. (In re Guardianship N.D.K.)

181 A.3d 252, 232 N.J. 490

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 22, 2018·No. M–993/994 September Term 2017; 079700·Published

Opinion

It is ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration, clarification, and other relief in respect of the remand proceedings (M-993) is denied. The trial court shall determine the manner and scope of the remand proceedings as necessary to resolve the discreet issues posed by the remand Order; and it is further

ORDERED that the motion to stay the remand (M-994) is denied, and the date on which the trial court shall file its written report containing its findings is extended to forty-five (45) days from the filed date of this Order, and the parties may file submissions with the Court addressing those findings within twenty-one (21) days thereafter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration, clarification, and other relief in respect of the remand proceedings (M-993) is denied. The trial court shall determine the manner and scope of the remand proceedings as necessary to resolve the discreet issues posed by the remand Order; and it is further

ORDERED that the motion to stay the remand (M-994) is denied, and the date on which the trial court shall file its written report containing its findings is extended to forty-five (45) days from the filed date of this Order, and the parties may file submissions with the Court addressing those findings within twenty-one (21) days thereafter.

N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. A.S.K. (In re Guardianship N.D.K.), 181 A.3d 252, 232 N.J. 490 (N.J. 2018).

Pincite

181 A.3d 252 (N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. A.S.K. (In re Guardianship N.D.K.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.