Niyaz v. Bank of America

Fourth Circuit

Niyaz v. Bank of America

442 F. App'x 838

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 11, 2011

DocketNo. 11-1101

StatusPublished

This text of 442 F. App'x 838 (Niyaz v. Bank of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Niyaz v. Bank of America, 442 F. App'x 838 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Asad Sammi Niyaz appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants in his lawsuit filed in an attempt to prevent foreclosure on his property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Niyaz v. Bank of America, No. 1:10-cv-00796-JCC-TCB, 2011 WL 68655 (E.D.Va. Jan. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Asad Sammi Niyaz appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants in his lawsuit filed in an attempt to prevent foreclosure on his property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Niyaz v. Bank of America, No. 1:10-cv-00796-JCC-TCB, 2011 WL 68655 (E.D.Va. Jan. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

442 F. App'x 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/niyaz-v-bank-of-america-ca4-2011.