Niyaz v. Bank of America

Fourth Circuit

Niyaz v. Bank of America

442 F. App'x 838

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2011·No. No. 11-1101·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Asad Sammi Niyaz appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants in his lawsuit filed in an attempt to prevent foreclosure on his property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Niyaz v. Bank of America, No. 1:10-cv-00796-JCC-TCB, 2011 WL 68655 (E.D.Va. Jan. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Asad Sammi Niyaz appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants in his lawsuit filed in an attempt to prevent foreclosure on his property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Niyaz v. Bank of America, No. 1:10-cv-00796-JCC-TCB, 2011 WL 68655 (E.D.Va. Jan. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Niyaz v. Bank of America, 442 F. App'x 838 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

442 F. App'x 838 (Niyaz v. Bank of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.