Nixon v. United States
This text of 59 Ct. Cl. 684 (Nixon v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[685]*685memorandum by the court
The petition does not show a contract, express or implied, in accordance with the requirements of the Dent Act, 40 Stat., 1272. This act authorizes compensation for expenditures made upon the faith of an “ agreement, express or implied,” entered into by a plaintiff with an officer or agent acting under the authority of the Secretary of War or the President, and acting within the scope of his authority when such an agreement was not executed in the manner provided by law. See Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. Case, 261 U. S. 592, 596. The implied agreement contemplated by the Dent Act must be an actual agreement; that is, an agreement “ implied in fact,” founded .upon a meeting of the minds. See Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. Case, supra (p. 597) and also Baltimore c& Ohio R. R. Co. Case, 261 U. S. 385, 386.
The petition is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 Ct. Cl. 684, 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 415, 1924 WL 2415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nixon-v-united-states-cc-1924.