Nixon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Nixon v. State

1923 OK CR 312, 219 P. 1119, 25 Okla. Crim. 189, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 54

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 3, 1923

DocketNo. A-4113.

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK CR 312 (Nixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nixon v. State, 1923 OK CR 312, 219 P. 1119, 25 Okla. Crim. 189, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 54 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 30th day of August, 1921, the plaintiff in error was convicted of the illegal transportation of intoxicating liquor, alleged to have occurred on June 17, 1921. By a verdict of a jury his punishment was fixed at confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days and to pay a fine of $100. Plaintiff in error says the judgment of the trial court should be reversed: (1) Because the jurors were shown to be disqualified; and (2) because the verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. The record, as we analyze it, does not support either of these claims. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the 30th day of August, 1921, the plaintiff in error was convicted of the illegal transportation of intoxicating liquor, alleged to have occurred on June 17, 1921. By a verdict of a jury his punishment was fixed at confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days and to pay a fine of $100. Plaintiff in error says the judgment of the trial court should be reversed: (1) Because the jurors were shown to be disqualified; and (2) because the verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. The record, as we analyze it, does not support either of these claims. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 312, 219 P. 1119, 25 Okla. Crim. 189, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nixon-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.