Nixon v. Perry

3 S.E. 253, 77 Ga. 530, 1887 Ga. LEXIS 131
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 1, 1887·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Blandford, Justice.

The question in this case is, whether an action will lie at the instance of a person who' has expended money in [531]*531the support and maintenance of a bastard child, against the reputed father of such child. We are of opinion that no such action lies in this State. The reputed father of a bastard child can only be made to support the child in the manner pointed out by the code; that is to say, a warrant must have been issued against him, and he must have been required to give bond to support such child, and when he has given such bond, the ordinary, when the child has become chargeable to the county, may institute an action on the bond so taken, and may recover the full amount of said bond, which judgment is to remain open and be subject to be appropriated by the courts aforesaid, from time to time, as the situation and exgiencies of said bastard child may require. See code, §4764.

The judgment in this case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nixon v. Perry, 3 S.E. 253, 77 Ga. 530, 1887 Ga. LEXIS 131 (Ga. 1887).

3 S.E. 253 (Nixon v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Y. v. S.
224 Ga. 352 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)
Mangum v. State
86 S.E.2d 365 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Washington v. Martin
43 S.E.2d 590 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Colson v. Huber
39 S.E.2d 539 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)