Nixon v. Nixon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Nixon v. Nixon

87 A. 454, 85 N.J.L. 380, 56 Vroom 380, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 298

DecidedJune 26, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A. 454 (Nixon v. Nixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nixon v. Nixon, 87 A. 454, 85 N.J.L. 380, 56 Vroom 380, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 298 (N.J. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and consideration of all of the evidence submitted to the jury in this ease, we feel satisfied that its verdict is not supported by a preponderance of that evidence, but on the contrary is opposed to it. For this reason the rule to show cause must be made absolute.

For affirm,anee — None.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenckard, Parker, K&lisoit, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Terhune, Heeeen-HEISTER, JJ. 13.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and consideration of all of the evidence submitted to the jury in this ease, we feel satisfied that its verdict is not supported by a preponderance of that evidence, but on the contrary is opposed to it. For this reason the rule to show cause must be made absolute.

For affirm,anee — None.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenckard, Parker, K&lisoit, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Terhune, Heeeen-HEISTER, JJ. 13.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A. 454, 85 N.J.L. 380, 56 Vroom 380, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nixon-v-nixon-nj-1913.