Nixon v. Myers

21 A. 670, 141 Pa. 477, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1088
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 13, 1891·No. No. 166·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam:

We do not find any error in the charge of the learned judge below. The plaintiff brought his suit for breach of contract. Under the circumstances, he was not entitled to recover the special wages for the year, but merely damages for the breach. We think the measure of damages, as defined by the court, was correct.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nixon v. Myers, 21 A. 670, 141 Pa. 477, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1088 (Pa. 1891).

21 A. 670 (Nixon v. Myers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swavely v. Eno
54 Pa. Super. 82 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Christian
60 A. 1087 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)