Nixon v. . Morse

139 S.E. 170, 194 N.C. 225, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 52
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 14, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 139 S.E. 170 (Nixon v. . Morse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nixon v. . Morse, 139 S.E. 170, 194 N.C. 225, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 52 (N.C. 1927).

Opinion

Peb Cubiam.

Plaintiff’s assignments of error upon his appeal to this Court cannot be sustained.

The jury has found that plaintiff and defendant were partners under the firm name and style of Richardson-Nixon Company. The notes sued upon, executed by defendant, were payable to the order of the partnership; the advancements were made by the partnership to defendant. Both the notes and the account for advancements are assets of the partnership. Neither plaintiff nor defendant can maintain an action against the other for the recovery of partnership assets. There has been no settlement of the partnership business. The claims of plaintiff and defendant, growing out of their dealings with the partnership, have not been adjusted. There has been no accounting between the partnership and its members, in order to determine their respective rights in and to the partnership assets.

The judgment is affirmed. There is

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Ziskind
195 N.E. 346 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Arrow v. . Chandgie
157 S.E. 924 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S.E. 170, 194 N.C. 225, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nixon-v-morse-nc-1927.