Nixon v. Kent County

Sixth Circuit

Nixon v. Kent County

34 F.3d 369, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33077, 1994 WL 487314

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 21, 1994

DocketNo. 93-1456

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 34 F.3d 369 (Nixon v. Kent County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nixon v. Kent County, 34 F.3d 369, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33077, 1994 WL 487314 (6th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

[384]*384ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this ease is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI