Nixon v. Dewalt

63 F. App'x 765
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2003·No. No. 02-7181·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpulished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Lee Nixon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nixon v. Dewalt, No. CA-02-48-5 BO (E.D.N.C. June 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nixon v. Dewalt, 63 F. App'x 765 (4th Cir. 2003).

63 F. App'x 765 (Nixon v. Dewalt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241