Nixon v. Credit Cars

693 F. App'x 463
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 17, 2017·No. No. 16-4120·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas residents Douglas Nixon and Piaowaka Windwolf appeal the district court’s1 order granting summary judgment to one defendant and dismissing the claims against other defendants in their pro se action arising out of a used car purchase. Upon careful de novo review, see Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (dismissal for failure to state a claim reviewed de novo); Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (grant of summary judgment reviewed de novo), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nixon v. Credit Cars, 693 F. App'x 463 (8th Cir. 2017).

693 F. App'x 463 (Nixon v. Credit Cars) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert Aaron Peterson v. Officer Michael Kopp
754 F.3d 594 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)
Arlena Kelly v. City of Omaha
813 F.3d 1070 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)