Nixon v. Credit Cars

Eighth Circuit

Nixon v. Credit Cars

693 F. App'x 463

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJuly 17, 2017

DocketNo. 16-4120

StatusPublished

This text of 693 F. App'x 463 (Nixon v. Credit Cars) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nixon v. Credit Cars, 693 F. App'x 463 (8th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas residents Douglas Nixon and Piaowaka Windwolf appeal the district court’s¹ order granting summary judgment to one defendant and dismissing the claims against other defendants in their pro se action arising out of a used car purchase. Upon careful de novo review, see Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (dismissal for failure to state a claim reviewed de novo); Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (grant of summary judgment reviewed de novo), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas residents Douglas Nixon and Piaowaka Windwolf appeal the district court’s¹ order granting summary judgment to one defendant and dismissing the claims against other defendants in their pro se action arising out of a used car purchase. Upon careful de novo review, see Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (dismissal for failure to state a claim reviewed de novo); Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (grant of summary judgment reviewed de novo), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

693 F. App'x 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nixon-v-credit-cars-ca8-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack