Nixon, M. v. Harper

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 25, 2019·No. 21 WM 2019·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

MARK A. NIXON, : No. 21 WM 2019 :

Petitioner : : :

v. : : :

ORLANDO HARPER, ET AL, : COMMONWEALTH OF PA, : :

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2019, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DISMISSED. See

Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282, 293 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that a pro se filing

presented by an appellant represented by counsel is a “legal nullity”). The Prothonotary

is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nixon, M. v. Harper, (Pa. 2019).

Nixon, M. v. Harper (Nixon, M. v. Harper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)