Nixon, M. v. Harper
This text of Nixon, M. v. Harper (Nixon, M. v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
MARK A. NIXON, : No. 21 WM 2019 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : ORLANDO HARPER, ET AL, : COMMONWEALTH OF PA, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2019, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282, 293 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that a pro se filing
presented by an appellant represented by counsel is a “legal nullity”). The Prothonotary
is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nixon, M. v. Harper, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nixon-m-v-harper-pa-2019.