Nixon ex rel. Parsons v. St. Joseph Lead Co.

87 P.2d 1007, 60 Idaho 64
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 1938·No. No. 6558·Published

Opinions

G-IVENS, J. —

In this case appellants, parents of the employee, Francis M. Nixon, deceased, sought compensation for his death alleged to have been due to silicosis contracted while in the employ of respondent. Except that herein the auditor applied for the $1,000 under sec. 43-1101, I. C. A., which claim he later abandoned, and that in this case the employee died from silicosis, the facts are substantially the same as in Brown v. St. Joseph Lead Co., ante, p. 49, 87 Pac. (2d) 1000, No. 6557, this day decided, and the decision and law therein announced determines this case. The order of the hoard denying compensation is therefore reversed and remanded for further proceedings awarding compensation to the extent the parents of deceased were shown to be dependent on deceased.

Costs to appellants.

Holden, C. J., and Ailshie and Budge, JJ., concur. Morgan, J., deeming himself to be disqualified, did not sit with the court at the hearing nor participate in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nixon ex rel. Parsons v. St. Joseph Lead Co., 87 P.2d 1007, 60 Idaho 64 (Idaho 1938).

87 P.2d 1007 (Nixon ex rel. Parsons v. St. Joseph Lead Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. St. Joseph Lead Co.
87 P.2d 1000 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1938)
Moody v. State Highway Department
48 P.2d 1108 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1935)
Hiebert v. Howell
85 P.2d 699 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1938)
American Steel Foundries v. Industrial Commission
198 N.E. 687 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1935)
Hovey v. General Construction Co.
218 N.W. 768 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1928)
Wray v. . Woolen Mills
172 S.E. 487 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Smith v. Primrose Tapestry Co.
131 A. 703 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Beels v. Department of Labor and Industries
34 P.2d 917 (Washington Supreme Court, 1934)
Claim of O'Esau v. E. W. Bliss Co.
186 A.D. 556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
Omaha Boarding & Supply Co. v. Industrial Commission
138 N.E. 106 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1923)
Curtis v. Slater Construction Co.
168 N.W. 958 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1918)
Pardeick v. Iron City Engineering Co.
190 N.W. 719 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1922)