Nix v. State of Florida
This text of Nix v. State of Florida (Nix v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-0724 _____________________________
ELDON EUGENE NIX, JR.,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.
February 12, 2025
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Noetzel v. State, 328 So. 3d 933, 949 (Fla. 2021) (holding that “[b]ecause competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Noetzel’s waiver of the right to counsel was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent under Faretta, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting Noetzel’s request for self-representation”).
KELSEY, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler Kemper Payne, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Damaris Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nix v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nix-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.