Nix v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Nix v. State

142 S.E. 698, 38 Ga. App. 28, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 10

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 7, 1928

Docket18628

StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.E. 698 (Nix v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nix v. State, 142 S.E. 698, 38 Ga. App. 28, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 10 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant’s conviction of manufacturing intoxicating liquor was not authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. D. W. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error,

cited: Ga. App. Rep.: 25/243; 2/534 (2); 27/596; 28/347; 31/784; 32/18.

John G. Mitchell, solicitor-general, contra,

cited: Ga. App. Rep.: 25/493; 27/195; 28/262; 32/74; 35/592.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI