Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Nix v. State

Nix v. State

975 So. 2d 576, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2179, 2008 WL 441658
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 2008·No. No. 4D08-230·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct sentence, but without prejudice to raising the issue in a timely, non-successive rule 8.850 motion. See generally Tennant v. State, 827 So.2d 321 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)..

SHAHOOD, C.J., WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nix v. State, 975 So. 2d 576, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2179, 2008 WL 441658 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

975 So. 2d 576 (Nix v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

School Board of Miami-Dade County v. Leyva
975 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)