Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Nix v. State

Nix v. State

975 So. 2d 576, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2179, 2008 WL 441658
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2008
DocketNo. 4D08-230
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 975 So. 2d 576 (Nix v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nix v. State, 975 So. 2d 576, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2179, 2008 WL 441658 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct sentence, but without prejudice to raising the issue in a timely, non-successive rule 8.850 motion. See generally Tennant v. State, 827 So.2d 321 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)..

SHAHOOD, C.J., WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

School Board of Miami-Dade County v. Leyva
975 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
975 So. 2d 576, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2179, 2008 WL 441658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nix-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.