Nix v. Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Nix v. Southern Railway Co.

61 S.E. 292, 4 Ga. App. 331, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 286

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 7, 1908

Docket1056; 1057

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 S.E. 292 (Nix v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nix v. Southern Railway Co., 61 S.E. 292, 4 Ga. App. 331, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 286 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

A car-coupler who sees and • knows that the draw-head and knuckle of the coupling are defective and will not act automatically, and who, while an engine with cars attached is backing rapidly to the point where the coupling is to be made, kicks against the draw-head and knuckle, to adjust them, just at the moment of impact, and thus gets his foot mashed, is, in legal contemplation, the author of his own injury, and can not hold the railway company liable therefor, although a signal given by him was disregarded by the engineer in thus rapidly-backing the engine and cars; it not appearing that the injured employee ' did not see and know the speed at which the engine and cars were running. Griffith v. Railroad Co., 124 Ga. 553 (53 S. E. 97, 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 854). Judgment affirmed.

M. B. Eubanks, W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff,

cited: Ga. R. 87/631; 91/28; 73/814; 77/429; 103/820; Ga. App. 1/94, 281, 403, 413, 441; 2/295; Ga. R. 113/708; 122/88.

Maddox, McCamy <£• Shumate, George A. II. Harris & Son, for defendant,

cited: Ga. R. 92/495; 103/584; 124/553; 1 Ga. App. 259 (6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

A car-coupler who sees and • knows that the draw-head and knuckle of the coupling are defective and will not act automatically, and who, while an engine with cars attached is backing rapidly to the point where the coupling is to be made, kicks against the draw-head and knuckle, to adjust them, just at the moment of impact, and thus gets his foot mashed, is, in legal contemplation, the author of his own injury, and can not hold the railway company liable therefor, although a signal given by him was disregarded by the engineer in thus rapidly-backing the engine and cars; it not appearing that the injured employee ' did not see and know the speed at which the engine and cars were running. Griffith v. Railroad Co., 124 Ga. 553 (53 S. E. 97, 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 854). Judgment affirmed.

M. B. Eubanks, W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff,

cited: Ga. R. 87/631; 91/28; 73/814; 77/429; 103/820; Ga. App. 1/94, 281, 403, 413, 441; 2/295; Ga. R. 113/708; 122/88.

Maddox, McCamy <£• Shumate, George A. II. Harris & Son, for defendant,

cited: Ga. R. 92/495; 103/584; 124/553; 1 Ga. App. 259 (6).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 S.E. 292, 4 Ga. App. 331, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nix-v-southern-railway-co-gactapp-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack