Nix, Halsell & Co. v. Underhill
This text of 1899 OK 34 (Nix, Halsell & Co. v. Underhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the court by
This cause is- here upon a transcript of the record. The facts and circumstances shown by this Tec-ord present precisely the same question involved in Smith v. Baker, 5 Okla. 326, 49 Pac. 61, and Smith-McCord Dry-Goods Co. v. John B. Farwell & Co., 6 Okla. 318, 50 Pac. *124 149, wherein it was held that, where an insolvent debtor-makes conveyances of the whole of his property, by chat-tie mortgage, to one or more of his creditors, in good faith, for the security of a Iona, fide indebtedness, although in exclusion of other creditors, the transaction lacks the essential elements- of a trust for the benefit of creditors, and is not brought within the statute relating to voluntary assignments. The statute regulating and permitting voluntary assignments by insolvent debtors for the benefit of creditors- was not intended to, and does n-o-t, affect -or qualify the rights of such debtors to make preferences among their creditors under section 4, ch. 5 Statutes 1893. Upon the authority of those cases, the judgment herein is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1899 OK 34, 56 P. 959, 8 Okla. 123, 1899 Okla. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nix-halsell-co-v-underhill-okla-1899.