Nivogor Realty Corp. v. Gifford-Wood Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nivogor Realty Corp. v. Gifford-Wood Co.

253 A.D. 837, 1 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8846

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 253 A.D. 837 (Nivogor Realty Corp. v. Gifford-Wood Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nivogor Realty Corp. v. Gifford-Wood Co., 253 A.D. 837, 1 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting motion by plaintiff to strike out the first and second defenses and the first and second partial defenses in the answer of defendant as being insufficient in law, modified by providing that the first defense shall be retained in the answer; as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Defendant may serve an amended answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The defenses of waiver, consent, acquiescence and ratification, whether under the terms of the contract by practical interpretation of the parties or otherwise, or by subsequent conduct, may properly await the production of proof on the trial in respect to the validity thereof. The hypothetical form of pleading is not approved. Carswell, Davis and Close, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Adel, JJ., dissent as to modification and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting motion by plaintiff to strike out the first and second defenses and the first and second partial defenses in the answer of defendant as being insufficient in law, modified by providing that the first defense shall be retained in the answer; as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Defendant may serve an amended answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The defenses of waiver, consent, acquiescence and ratification, whether under the terms of the contract by practical interpretation of the parties or otherwise, or by subsequent conduct, may properly await the production of proof on the trial in respect to the validity thereof. The hypothetical form of pleading is not approved. Carswell, Davis and Close, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Adel, JJ., dissent as to modification and vote to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 837, 1 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nivogor-realty-corp-v-gifford-wood-co-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack