Nivens v. Signal Oil & Gas Co.

523 F.2d 1382
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided November 28, 1975·No. 74-2206·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

523 F.2d 1382

Albert L. NIVENS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SIGNAL OIL & GAS CO., INC., Defendant Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
LOUISIANA OFFSHORE CATERERS, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee,
Travelers Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant.

No. 74-2206.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 28, 1975.

Geoffrey H. Longenecker, William A. Porteous, III, New Orleans, La., for Signal.

James J. Morse, Jr., New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Donald V. Organ, New Orleans, La., for Alfred Nivens.

Fred E. Salley, Edward J. Koehl, Jr., Donald L. King, New Orleans, La., for La. Offshore Caterers.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion October 8, 1975, 5 Cir., 1975, 520 F.2d 1019).

Before GODBOLD, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Associate Judge,* and GEE, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The District Court denied the claim of Signal against Louisiana Offshore for indemnity and Signal appealed therefrom. Our opinion did not specifically dispose of that facet of the case. Since we hold that plaintiff's claim against Signal had prescribed, the finding that Louisiana Offshore is not liable for indemnity is due to be affirmed. The last sentence of the opinion is therefore amended to read: reversed in part, affirmed in part.

The Petition of plaintiff for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) plaintiff's Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

*

Of the U. S. Court of Claims, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nivens v. Signal Oil & Gas Co., 523 F.2d 1382 (3d Cir. 1975).

523 F.2d 1382 (Nivens v. Signal Oil & Gas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duke v. Housen
589 P.2d 334 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1979)
United States v. James Robert Peltier
523 F.2d 1382 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)