Nivcab, Inc. v. Accord Insurance Network of America, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nivcab, Inc. v. Accord Insurance Network of America, Inc.

24 So. 3d 1204, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20023, 2009 WL 4928056

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 23, 2009

Docket4D09-1854

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 So. 3d 1204 (Nivcab, Inc. v. Accord Insurance Network of America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nivcab, Inc. v. Accord Insurance Network of America, Inc., 24 So. 3d 1204, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20023, 2009 WL 4928056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

NIVCAB, Inc. appeals a circuit court order vacating an entry of default judgment against Thomas Kane. We affirm.

In North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849, 852 (Fla.1962), the Florida Supreme Court explained that a “showing of gross abuse of a trial court’s discretion is necessary on appeal to justify reversal of the lower court’s ruling on a motion to vacate.” In attempting to define the heightened requirement of “gross abuse,” we have determined that appellate judges “should be as deferential to a trial judge’s decision vacating a default as [we] can possibly be, upsetting it very rarely and *1205 only with undeniable provocation.” Bethesda Mem’l Hosp., Inc. v. Laska, 977 So.2d 804, 806 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

We do not find the trial court’s decision in this case so contrary to reason that we are “undeniably provoked” to act. We affirm and find the trial court’s order to set aside the default judgment was a sound exercise of its discretion consistent with North Shore Hospital and Laska.

Affirmed.

WARNER, FARMER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

NIVCAB, Inc. appeals a circuit court order vacating an entry of default judgment against Thomas Kane. We affirm.

In North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849, 852 (Fla.1962), the Florida Supreme Court explained that a “showing of gross abuse of a trial court’s discretion is necessary on appeal to justify reversal of the lower court’s ruling on a motion to vacate.” In attempting to define the heightened requirement of “gross abuse,” we have determined that appellate judges “should be as deferential to a trial judge’s decision vacating a default as [we] can possibly be, upsetting it very rarely and *1205 only with undeniable provocation.” Bethesda Mem’l Hosp., Inc. v. Laska, 977 So.2d 804, 806 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

We do not find the trial court’s decision in this case so contrary to reason that we are “undeniably provoked” to act. We affirm and find the trial court’s order to set aside the default judgment was a sound exercise of its discretion consistent with North Shore Hospital and Laska.

Affirmed.

WARNER, FARMER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 So. 3d 1204, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20023, 2009 WL 4928056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nivcab-inc-v-accord-insurance-network-of-america-inc-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack