Nitzberg v. Kapilow-Hyers, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Nitzberg v. Kapilow-Hyers, Inc.

138 Misc. 671, 245 N.Y.S. 695, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1639

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 138 Misc. 671 (Nitzberg v. Kapilow-Hyers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nitzberg v. Kapilow-Hyers, Inc., 138 Misc. 671, 245 N.Y.S. 695, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that it was prejudicial error to permit plaintiff’s counsel to cross-examine defendants’ witnesses as to the court’s charge to the jury on a prior trial with respect to plaintiff’s right to recover at least part of his claim.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that it was prejudicial error to permit plaintiff’s counsel to cross-examine defendants’ witnesses as to the court’s charge to the jury on a prior trial with respect to plaintiff’s right to recover at least part of his claim.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 Misc. 671, 245 N.Y.S. 695, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nitzberg-v-kapilow-hyers-inc-nyappterm-1930.