Nitto Shosen K. K. v. William H. Johnson, Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. Nitto Shosen K. K.
This text of 350 F.2d 399 (Nitto Shosen K. K. v. William H. Johnson, Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. Nitto Shosen K. K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NITTO SHOSEN K. K., Appellant,
v.
William H. JOHNSON, Appellee.
CRESCENT WHARF & WAREHOUSE CO., Appellant,
v.
NITTO SHOSEN K. K., Appellee.
No. 19633.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 12, 1965.
Gordon K. Wright, Francis J. MacLaughlin, Lillick, Geary, McHose & Roethke, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant, Nitto Shosen K.K.
Ben Margolis, Margolis & McTernan, Los Angeles, Cal., George E. Shibley, Long Beach, Cal., for appellee, Wm. H. Johnson.
Robert Sikes, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant, Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.
Before ORR, MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the instructions given when the charge is read as a whole. Accordingly upon both appeals judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
350 F.2d 399, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nitto-shosen-k-k-v-william-h-johnson-crescent-wharf-warehouse-co-v-ca9-1965.