Nitla, S.A. De C v. v. Nationsbank of Texas, N.A. N/K/A Bank of America, N.A., (Also F/K/A Nationsbank, N.A.)
This text of Nitla, S.A. De C v. v. Nationsbank of Texas, N.A. N/K/A Bank of America, N.A., (Also F/K/A Nationsbank, N.A.) (Nitla, S.A. De C v. v. Nationsbank of Texas, N.A. N/K/A Bank of America, N.A., (Also F/K/A Nationsbank, N.A.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 20, 2004.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-04-00070-CV
NO. 14-04-00303-CV
NITLA, S.A. de C.V., Appellant
V.
NATIONSBANK OF TEXAS, N.A. n/k/a BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
(also f/k/a NATIONSBANK, N.A.), Appellee
On Appeal from the 215th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 96-44152
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The trial court signed a final judgment in cause number 96-44152 on October 22, 2003. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment, which is docketed under our appeal number 14-04-00070-CV. On February 28, 2004, this court ordered the parties to mediation.
On March 19, 2004, the trial court signed a turnover order and appointed a receiver for appellant=s assets. Appellant filed notices of appeal from this order, and the second appeal is docketed under our appeal number 14-04-00303-CV. On March 29, 2004, appellant filed a motion to consolidate the two appeals. The motion was granted.
On April 6, 2004, this court denied an emergency motion for temporary relief requesting that we stay enforcement of the judgment. Appellant=s motion to review the amount of the supersedeas deposit remained pending before the court. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4.
On May 17, 2004, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeals because the case has been settled in mediation. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The parties also request that all motions or other pending matters related to these appeals be denied. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the appeals are ordered dismissed. Appellant=s motion to review the supersedeas deposit is denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 20, 2004.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Frost and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nitla, S.A. De C v. v. Nationsbank of Texas, N.A. N/K/A Bank of America, N.A., (Also F/K/A Nationsbank, N.A.), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nitla-sa-de-c-v-v-nationsbank-of-texas-na-nka-bank-texapp-2004.