Niteroi D. Thomas v. State
Opinion
Opinion issued October 15, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00380-CR ——————————— NITEROI D. THOMAS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 21st District Court Lee County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 8047
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Niteroi D. Thomas, has neither established indigence, nor paid, or
made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 20.2 (listing requirements for establishing indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing
dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately
respond. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R.
APP. P. 37.3(b); Sutherland v. State, 132 S.W.3d 510, 512 (Tex. App.—Houston
[1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.) (dismissing criminal appeal for want of prosecution based
on appellant’s failure to pay for clerk’s record). We dismiss all pending motions as
moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Niteroi D. Thomas v. State (Niteroi D. Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.