Niteroi D. Thomas v. State

Opinion

Opinion issued October 15, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately

respond. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R.

APP. P. 37.3(b); Sutherland v. State, 132 S.W.3d 510, 512 (Tex. App.—Houston

[1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.) (dismissing criminal appeal for want of prosecution based

on appellant’s failure to pay for clerk’s record). We dismiss all pending motions as

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-15-00380-CR ——————————— NITEROI D. THOMAS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 21st District Court Lee County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 8047 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Niteroi D. Thomas, has neither established indigence, nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2 (listing requirements for establishing indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault). After being