Nita Corp. v. Kagan

766 So. 2d 410, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10366, 2000 WL 1153320
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 2000·No. No. 3D00-402·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although counsel for Appellee’s summation at trial contained improper arguments, we find these to be harmless. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999); Decks, Inc. v. Nunez, 299 So.2d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nita Corp. v. Kagan, 766 So. 2d 410, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10366, 2000 WL 1153320 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

766 So. 2d 410 (Nita Corp. v. Kagan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Decks, Inc. v. Nunez
299 So. 2d 165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)