Nit Wang v. Nebraska Public Power District

639 F. App'x 389
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 26, 2016
Docket15-2234
StatusUnpublished

This text of 639 F. App'x 389 (Nit Wang v. Nebraska Public Power District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nit Wang v. Nebraska Public Power District, 639 F. App'x 389 (8th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nit Wang appeals the adverse judgment entered by the district court 1 after a jury trial. He argues that the district court erred by misrepresenting evidence when responding to jury questions. We cannot address the merits of this argument, as Wang has not provided a transcript of the trial proceedings. See Meroney v. Delta Int’l Mach. Corp., 18 F.3d 1436, 1437 (8th Cir.1994) (although failure to provide complete transcript did not deprive court of jurisdiction, it did constitute grounds for dismissing appeal where lack of trial transcript prevented any meaningful review of issues raised by appellant); see also Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2) (describing appellant’s responsibility to provide transcript).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

1

. The Honorable Joseph F, Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 F. App'x 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nit-wang-v-nebraska-public-power-district-ca8-2016.