Nit Wang v. Nebraska Public Power District

639 F. App'x 389
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2016·No. 15-2234·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nit Wang appeals the adverse judgment entered by the district court 1 after a jury trial. He argues that the district court erred by misrepresenting evidence when responding to jury questions. We cannot address the merits of this argument, as Wang has not provided a transcript of the trial proceedings. See Meroney v. Delta Int’l Mach. Corp., 18 F.3d 1436, 1437 (8th Cir.1994) (although failure to provide complete transcript did not deprive court of jurisdiction, it did constitute grounds for dismissing appeal where lack of trial transcript prevented any meaningful review of issues raised by appellant); see also Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2) (describing appellant’s responsibility to provide transcript).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

1

. The Honorable Joseph F, Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nit Wang v. Nebraska Public Power District, 639 F. App'x 389 (8th Cir. 2016).

639 F. App'x 389 (Nit Wang v. Nebraska Public Power District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related