Niswonger v. State

545 S.W.3d 879
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 6, 2018·No. No. ED 105151·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Aaron Niswonger appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Niswonger v. State, 545 S.W.3d 879 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

545 S.W.3d 879 (Niswonger v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.