Niswonger v. State
545 S.W.3d 879
Opinion
Aaron Niswonger appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Niswonger v. State, 545 S.W.3d 879 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
545 S.W.3d 879 (Niswonger v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.