Nissho-Iwai American Corp. v. Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nissho-Iwai American Corp. v. Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc.

39 A.D.2d 653, 332 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4652

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 A.D.2d 653 (Nissho-Iwai American Corp. v. Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nissho-Iwai American Corp. v. Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc., 39 A.D.2d 653, 332 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 13, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the facte, and the plaintiff’s motion for a protective order granted without prejudice; and the notice for discovery and inspection is vacated on the ground that the documents sought to be discovered are not sufficiently identified to enable the court to make an informative determination as to their relevancy on the issues here involved. (Rios v. Donovan, 21 A D 2d 409, 414.) Appellant shall recover of respondent $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., McNally, Tilzer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 13, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the facte, and the plaintiff’s motion for a protective order granted without prejudice; and the notice for discovery and inspection is vacated on the ground that the documents sought to be discovered are not sufficiently identified to enable the court to make an informative determination as to their relevancy on the issues here involved. (Rios v. Donovan, 21 A D 2d 409, 414.) Appellant shall recover of respondent $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., McNally, Tilzer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 653, 332 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nissho-iwai-american-corp-v-lehigh-valley-industries-inc-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack