Nissen v. Bendixsen

3 P. 404, 2 Cal. Unrep. 285
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 14, 1884
DocketNo. 9088
StatusPublished

This text of 3 P. 404 (Nissen v. Bendixsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nissen v. Bendixsen, 3 P. 404, 2 Cal. Unrep. 285 (Cal. 1884).

Opinion

By the COURT.

The original transcript did not show that the notice of appeal was served on the plaintiff’s attorney of record, and a motion to dismiss on that ground was made by said attorney. When the motion was called up, the defendant’s attorney suggested diminution of record, and asked and obtained leave to file a certificate of the clerk of the court below showing that proof of service of said notice on plaintiff’s said attorney of record is on file in the office of said clerk.

Motion to dismiss denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 P. 404, 2 Cal. Unrep. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nissen-v-bendixsen-cal-1884.