Nisman v. G.W. Green, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nisman v. G.W. Green, Inc.

262 A.D.2d 618, 691 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7639

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D.2d 618 (Nisman v. G.W. Green, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nisman v. G.W. Green, Inc., 262 A.D.2d 618, 691 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated March 30, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of the [619]*619plaintiff Margarita Gulyako on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there is a question of fact as to whether the plaintiff Margarita Gulyako sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Grullon v Chang Ok Chu, 240 AD2d 367; Parker v Defontaine-Stratton, 231 AD2d 412; see also, Risbrook v Coronamos Cab Corp., 244 AD2d 397). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated March 30, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of the [619]*619plaintiff Margarita Gulyako on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there is a question of fact as to whether the plaintiff Margarita Gulyako sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Grullon v Chang Ok Chu, 240 AD2d 367; Parker v Defontaine-Stratton, 231 AD2d 412; see also, Risbrook v Coronamos Cab Corp., 244 AD2d 397). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 618, 691 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nisman-v-gw-green-inc-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack